Neuromancer

Publikuota 1993 m. birželio 16 d., Harper Collins Publishers.

ISBN:
978-0-00-749152-0
Copied ISBN!

Žiūrėti „OpenLibrary“

4 žvaigždutės (9 atsiliepimai)

The first of William Gibson's 'Sprawl' trilogy, Neuromancer is the classic cyberpunk novel.

More information on the [novel's official page][1].

[1]: www.williamgibsonbooks.com/books/neuromancer.asp

54 leidimai

apžvelgė autoriaus William Gibson (unspecified) knygą Neuromancer (Sprawl trilogy, #1)

Fascinante

4 žvaigždutės

[ESP] Es fácil darse cuenta de por qué es tan influyente, aunque ha quedado comprensiblemente anticuado en algunas cosas, como hace notar Gibson en el prólogo.

El libro es más o menos complicado de leer, pero tiene varios pasajes ciertamente fascinantes, en los que se describe el mundo altamente computerizado que se contruye

[ENG] It's easy to grasp why this book is so important, even though in certain aspects it's understandably outdated, as Gibson himself notes in the prologue.

The book is somewhat difficult to follow, but has some fascinating parts in how well he describes the electronics heavy world he built

apžvelgė autoriaus William Gibson (unspecified) knygą Neuromancer (Sprawl trilogy, #1)

Fascinante

4 žvaigždutės

[ESP] Es fácil darse cuenta de por qué es tan influyente, aunque ha quedado comprensiblemente anticuado en algunas cosas, como hace notar Gibson en el prólogo.

El libro es más o menos complicado de leer, pero tiene varios pasajes ciertamente fascinantes, en los que se describe el mundo altamente computerizado que se contruye

[ENG] It's easy to grasp why this book is so important, even though in certain aspects it's understandably outdated, as Gibson himself notes in the prologue.

The book is somewhat difficult to follow, but has some fascinating parts in how well he describes the electronics heavy world he built

Debe leerse con gran disposición

3 žvaigždutės

Uno de los libros que me ha resultado más difícil de comentar/calificar... Por un lado, me parece admirable la forma en que Gibson se adelanta a su tiempo de maneras que muy pocos se atrevieron y muchos menos consiguieron convertir casi en "profecías". Por otro lado, la narrativa es difícil de seguir... No por compleja, quizás es un asunto de gusto personal o del momento de mi vida en que lo leí, pero me costó conectar emocionalmente con los personajes. Me lo apunto como un libro al que le debo una segunda lectura, con una disposición diferente de mi parte.

apžvelgė autoriaus William Gibson knygą Neuromancer

Desert Island Pulp Sci-fi

5 žvaigždutės

Anyone wanting to argue than Neuromancer has aged like either milk or wine will readily find all the examples they could want to make their case; but the depiction of the consensual hallucination in Neuromancer still reads like a more futuristic network and virtual reality technology than anything we have today.

The words visionary and iconic get thrown around by hypebeasts and idiots to the point they're a debased and inflated currency, but describing Neuromancer without them is telling lies of omission. Parts of Neuromancer still describe a vision of what may yet come (and a far from idealised vision at that).

For anyone who hasn't read it, expect it to make less sense on your first reading than the second. Some things seem overly detailed but on rereading the same ink on the same pages somehow has written different words leaving me a completely different impression second time around. …

apžvelgė autoriaus William Gibson knygą Neuromancer (Sprawl Trilogy, #1)

More about the ideas than anything else

3 žvaigždutės

It took a long time to read because it’s so dense and a little abstract the whole way through. Some noir plots in the beginning with an action movie ending, which is all well and good, but the characters don’t have much depth to them.

It’s a absolutely an important piece of sci-fi pop culture but as a novel it’s not memorable for me.

Review of 'Neuromancer (Remembering Tomorrow)' on 'Storygraph'

4 žvaigždutės

I thought I'd read this before, but remember nothing. Which is surprising, because it was really freak'n cool. From the very first line, it's all so dang evocative. I had to re-read so much of it to savour each description. But also had to re-read a lot because I only read a page or two at a time, and I got lost a lot returning to it, because everything moved so fast. But hot dang, I see why it's a classic.

avatar for DerekCaelin@bookwyrm.social

įvertino

5 žvaigždutės
avatar for petras

įvertino

2 žvaigždutės

Sąrašai